Obama, Democrats Vow to Pass Healthcare Bill With or Without GOP
Email This Post
-
Print This Post
- 
Obama’s speech to a joint session of Congress briefly sounded like a session of the British parliament when he was jeered and heckled during Wednesday night’s address. A southern Congressman shouted out Obama was a liar when he claimed no illegals would be covered under Obamacare. The Congressman apologized for breaking the decorum of the body but not for his comment’s content.
What Obama did do was ensure an overflowing Capitol this weekend as busloads of protestors descend there from across the nation to protest Obamacare..
Republicans are still insisting that the public option be firmly dismissed, and that more must be done to control costs. Tort lawyer cash is still too high a cost for Obama to pay as reform of malpractice remains anathema to Democrats.
| George Stephanopolis said Thursday morning that there is no change in the fundamentals of the debate, and Obama did not significantly change any minds.
Associated Press summarized the evening as follows: Shaking off a summer of setbacks, President Barack Obama summoned Congress to enact sweeping health care legislation Wednesday night, declaring the “time for bickering is over” and the moment has arrived to protect millions who have unreliable insurance or no coverage at all. Obama said the changes he has in mind would cost about $900 billion over decade, “less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few Americans” passed during the Bush administration. Obama’s speech came as the president and his allies in Congress readied an autumn campaign to enact Obama care — his top domestic priority. While Democrats command strong majorities in both the House and Senate, neither chamber has acted on Obama’s top domestic priority, missing numerous deadlines leaders had set for themselves. In a fresh sign of urgency, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., announced that his Senate Finance Committee would meet in two weeks to begin drafting legislation, whether or not a handful of Democrats and Republicans have come to an agreement. The panel is the last of five to act in Congress, and while the outcome is uncertain, it is the only one where bipartisanship has been given a chance to flourish. August saw hundreds of toften spirited town hall as citizens latched onto the spring TEA PARTY movement and raised hell demanding answers froml;ocal Congress members who often cowered rather than address those who elected them. Wednesday evening Obama said there is widespread agreement on about 80 percent of what must be included in legislation. Any yet, criticizing Republicans without saying so, he added: “Instead of honest debate, we have seen scare tactics” and ideological warfare that offers no hope for compromise. “Well, the time for bickering is over,” he said. “The time for games has passed. Now is the season for action.” “I am not the first president to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last,” he added.. The president was alternately bipartisan and tough on his Republican critics. He singled out Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., for praise at one point. Yet, moments later he accused Republicans of spreading the “cynical and irresponsible” charge that the legislation would include “death panels” with the power to hasten the death of senior citizens. In one gesture to Republicans, Obama said his administration would authorize a series of test programs in some states to check the impact of medical malpractice changes on health insurance costs. In a reflection of the stakes, White House aides mustered all the traditional pomp they could for a president who took office vowing to change Washington. The setting was a State of the Union-like joint session of Congress, attended by lawmakers, members of the Cabinet and diplomats. The House was packed, and loud applause greeted the president when he walked down the center aisle of the House chamber. Additionally, the White House invited as guests men and women who have suffered from high costs and insurance practices, seating them near first lady Michelle Obama. Vicki Kennedy, the widow of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., was also on the guest list. Kennedy, who died last month, had made health care a career-long cause. Obama intends to follow up the speech with an appearance Saturday in Minneapolis, the White House announced. Despite deep-seated differences among lawmakers, Obama drew a standing ovation when he recounted stories of Americans whose coverage was denied or delayed by their insurers with catastrophic results. “That is heartbreaking, it is wrong, and no one should me treated that way in the United States of America.” The president sought to cast his own plan as being in the comfortable political middle, rejecting both the government-run system that some liberals favor and the Republican-backed approach under which all consumers buy health insurance on their own. Obama said the legislation he seeks would guarantee insurance to consumers, regardless of pre-existing medical conditions, as well as other protections. “As soon as I sign this bill, it will be against the law for insurance companies to drop your coverage when you get sick or water it down when you need it most,” he added. The president assured those with insurance that “nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have.” Obama also said the legislation he seeks would help those who lack insurance to afford it. “These are not primarily people on welfare,” he said in a line that appeared aimed at easing concerns among working-class voters. “These are middle-class Americans.” The president also said he wants legislation that “will slow the growth of health care costs for our families.” Obama said a collective failure to meet the challenge of overhauling health care for decades has “led us to a breaking point.” Responding on behalf of Republicans, Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La., said in excerpts released in advance that the country wants Obama to instruct Democratic congressional leaders that “it’s time to start over on a common-sense, bipartisan plan focused on lowering the cost of health care while improving quality.” “Replacing your family’s current health care with government-run health care is not the answer,” said Boustany, a former cardiac surgeon. The so-called government option that Obama mentioned has emerged as one of the most contentious issues in the monthslong debate over health care, with liberal Democrats supporting it and many moderates inside the party opposed. An early draft of Baucus’ plan calls for an alternative consisting of nonprofit co-ops. Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, the Republican who seems most inclined to cross party lines on the issue, favors a different approach, consisting of a standby in which the government could sell insurance if competition fails to emerge in individual states. The speech took place after weeks of halting progress and highly publicized setbacks for Obama and his allies on the issue of health care. After internal divisions prevented House Democrats from passing legislation in July, numerous members of the rank and file were confronted in town-hall style meetings with highly vocal critics. There were charges - launched by former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and debunked by nonpartisan organizations - that the legislation included “death panels” whose purpose was to facilitate the end of life for the elderly under Medicare. At the same time, polling has shown a deterioration in support for the president, and an AP-GfK poll hours before the speech showed public disapproval of Obama’s handling of health care has jumped to 52 percent, an increase of 9 percentage points since July. Democrats had yet another change to factor into their plans. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s death this summer robbed them not only of the experience of one of the Senate’s most accomplished legislators, but also of their 60th vote in the Senate. That meant they needed at least one Republican vote to choke off any filibuster. Alternatively, they could try a more partisan approach, drafting a bill that could not be filibustered, but also shorn of some of the provisions they want. Major polls now show Obama with minority approval and his plummeting polls numbers have tipped voters against Congressional Democrats. Republicans greeted Obama’s appearance politely but coolly there were moanbs and the one member who shouted that he was a liar. . “When it comes to health care, Americans don’t want government to tear down the house we have,” said Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. “They want it to repair the one we’ve got. That means sensible, step-by-step reforms, not more trillion-dollar grand schemes.” Obama has said repeatedly that agreement exists on about 80 percent of the issues involved in drafting legislation, and the White House and Baucus have lined up numerous outside interests to help shepherd a bill to passage. The nation’s drugmakers and hospitals have already made deals to help pay a cost of the legislation. The American Medical Association also is in support, in large measure because the bills would avert planned reductions of 20 percent in their Medicare fees. AARP, which advocates for those aged 50 and over, supports the approach Obama and his congressional allies have taken. On the other hand, the nation’s health insurance providers have yet to come to terms with the White House. In recent weeks, Obama has used them as a target, accusing them of putting profits over patient coverage by denying coverage and other steps |

Comment by slowsmile on 12 September 2009:
Richard… Regarding health care, I am absolutely astonished at Obama’s sheer bloody cheek regarding his Health Care Bill. Just look at the numbers.
On the one hand, if we take a peek at Obama’s campaign contributions(from http://www.opensecrets.org) we see see that the health industry was in the top five with about $20 million. Total contributions from the health industry(the top contributor by the way) to the Democrats in 2008 was $50 million(with $45 given to the Republicans).
Then add to this that the Health Insurance industry has funded the ObamaCare advertising campaign to the tune of a mere $200 million. Why is the Health Industry supporting ObamaCare so avidly?….Because they’re going to make alot more money with his Health Bill, that’s why.
And on the other hand we have Obama’s rhetoric and bula-bula, where he continually uses words like “competitive” and “affordable”. And people actually believe this?
Obama is a screaming hypocrite.
Comment by Richard Cochrane on 13 September 2009:
Slowsmile: Obama is in a panic. He knows if he doesn’t get something passed in 2009 that oputs him into 2010 with the enite Houe facing reelection amid monster deficits; likely 10% unemployment and another 5-8% underemploent. He’s after HEALTH INSURERS because epople dislike them. Yes, all that makes him a hypocrite.
Comment by shelia on 15 October 2009:
This is another example of the House and Senate craming this down our throats whether we like it or not. They don’t care about America. They have crammed Nafta and many other things down our throats. Also Cap and Trade. We need to kick all their asses out. The Republicans allowed this to happen. They had 12 years and all they cared about was to “GET ALONG” with the Democrats. They didn’t care about our Freedoms and our lives.
The Republicans should take a good lesson from the Democrats and that is when you get into power CRAM DOWN EVERYTHING AS QUICK AS YOU CAN. The Democrates are Socialist and traitors to America. I am so sick and tired of all the people that have been in power longer than 6 years. http://www.KICKTHEMALLOUT.COM
Comment by slowsmile on 16 October 2009:
sheila…although I fully understand your reasons, even if you did manage to kick them all out, the next political bunch would be just as bad because it is not only government representatives that are bad — it is the very democratic process itself that is rotten to the core.
Consider this. How can an ordinary citizen make any significant change within the democratic process if he or she has to compete with the “gifts” and “promises” of the all-powerful special interest cartels and lobbyists who can offer bribes, directorships, caribbean holidays and golden toilets to their favourite government representatives?
It’s not just about replacing political representatives as I see it. The democratic process is completely corrupt and biased towards the special interest groups now, therefore this is what must be first repaired to achieve truly honest and transparent political governance.